Facing budgetary pressures, many organizations are considering changing
their print magazines to online publications. A recent Virginia Tech study1,
however, indicates that this might not be wise.
Subscribers to Virginia Tech’s alumni publication were sent either a print
version of the magazine or an email invitation linking to the online version
of the magazine, and then contacted by telephone and asked a series of
questions about the publication.
The results showed that:
More people remembered getting the print magazine—Only 49% of those
who received the online version remembered getting the email, while 82%
of those who received the print version remembered receiving it.
More people opened the print magazine—The print magazine was viewed by
77% of those who remembered receiving it, while only 49% of those who
remembered receiving the online invitation actually clicked through and
viewed the publication.
More people remembered articles from the print magazine—Respondents
who viewed the print version recalled a significantly greater number of
articles than did those who viewed the online version.
All in all, the print publication appeared to be more effective than the online
publication. As the author surmises, “ceasing a print publication in favor of
an online-only publication might hurt the effectiveness of an organization’s
marketing communication and managers should not make the decision
based on cost alone.”